Skip to content

Add ld.lld as linker#81

Merged
jwillemsen merged 1 commit intoDOCGroup:masterfrom
jwillemsen:jwi-ldlld
Mar 10, 2025
Merged

Add ld.lld as linker#81
jwillemsen merged 1 commit intoDOCGroup:masterfrom
jwillemsen:jwi-ldlld

Conversation

@jwillemsen
Copy link
Member

@jwillemsen jwillemsen commented Mar 10, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading 

* command/check_linker.pm:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced linker version checking to support an additional linker option for improved clarity.

@jwillemsen
Add ld.lld as linker
7c44558 
    * command/check_linker.pm:
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The pull request adds a new conditional branch within the Run method of the check_linker package to handle the "ld.lld" linker. When the linker is "ld.lld", the system executes the command system("ld.lld -v") to print its version. This check is evaluated before conditions for "ilink64" and "ilink" while preserving the existing control flow for other linker types. No changes were made to the exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
command/check_linker.pm Added a conditional branch in the Run method to handle "ld.lld" by executing system("ld.lld -v"); placed before the checks for "ilink64" and "ilink".

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Caller
    participant R as Run Method
    participant S as System Shell

    C->>R: Invoke Run with linker type
    alt linker is "ld.lld"
        R->>S: Execute system("ld.lld -v")
        S-->>R: Return version info
    else Other linkers
        R->>R: Process other conditions
    end
    R-->>C: Return outcome
Loading

Poem

In my burrow of code, I hop with glee,
A new branch sprouts for "ld.lld" to see,
It sings its version with a simple call,
Among the linkers, it stands tall,
Coding delights a rabbit's heart, full of glee!

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d5cb73 and 7c44558.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • command/check_linker.pm (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
command/check_linker.pm (1)

45-47: Addition of ld.lld linker support looks good!

The added code correctly follows the existing pattern for checking linker versions. This addition makes sense as LLD is LLVM's linker, which is becoming increasingly popular for its performance benefits. The implementation is clean and matches the style of the surrounding code.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jwillemsen jwillemsen merged commit 148e361 into DOCGroup:master Mar 10, 2025
2 checks passed
@jwillemsen jwillemsen deleted the jwi-ldlld branch March 10, 2025 15:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jwillemsen